<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pick&#160;One.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iammattthomas.com/journal/pick-one/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.iammattthomas.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fiammattthomas.com%2Fjournal%2Fpick-one&amp;seed_title=Pick%26%23160%3BOne.</link>
	<description>An enigma, wrapped in a paradox, inside a jelly donut.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-beta3-9791</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.iammattthomas.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fiammattthomas.com%2Fjournal%2Fpick-one&amp;seed_title=Pick%26%23160%3BOne./comment-page-1#comment-504</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2005 10:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iammattthomas.com/?p=209#comment-504</guid>
		<description>I don&#8217;t disagree that it&#8217;s probably an improvement. I just fear that they&#8217;re not &lt;em&gt;replacing&lt;/em&gt; anything, just adding to the clutter. I guess we&#8217;ll see over the next few months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t disagree that it&#8217;s probably an improvement. I just fear that they&#8217;re not <em>replacing</em> anything, just adding to the clutter. I guess we&#8217;ll see over the next few months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Grimes</title>
		<link>http://www.iammattthomas.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fiammattthomas.com%2Fjournal%2Fpick-one&amp;seed_title=Pick%26%23160%3BOne./comment-page-1#comment-503</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Grimes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2005 01:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iammattthomas.com/?p=209#comment-503</guid>
		<description>Well coming from a Windoze user (please don&#8217;t hurt me) I think the new &#8220;streamlined&#8221; look is quite nice. It is closest thing I have to nice looking on my XP box. I can see your points though about all the different looks melded together would get tedious to gander at all day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well coming from a Windoze user (please don&#8217;t hurt me) I think the new &#8220;streamlined&#8221; look is quite nice. It is closest thing I have to nice looking on my XP box. I can see your points though about all the different looks melded together would get tedious to gander at all day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan LaCour</title>
		<link>http://www.iammattthomas.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fiammattthomas.com%2Fjournal%2Fpick-one&amp;seed_title=Pick%26%23160%3BOne./comment-page-1#comment-502</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan LaCour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2005 23:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iammattthomas.com/?p=209#comment-502</guid>
		<description>I am with you 100%.  I think that the hiring of the designer of Delicious Library, Mike Matas, and a couple of other hires by Apple over the past year or so are great signs that they will be doing something big with the interface in Leopard.  The sad fact is that we will be living with this inconsistency for at least another year or two before Leopard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am with you 100%.  I think that the hiring of the designer of Delicious Library, Mike Matas, and a couple of other hires by Apple over the past year or so are great signs that they will be doing something big with the interface in Leopard.  The sad fact is that we will be living with this inconsistency for at least another year or two before Leopard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.iammattthomas.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fiammattthomas.com%2Fjournal%2Fpick-one&amp;seed_title=Pick%26%23160%3BOne./comment-page-1#comment-501</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2005 23:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iammattthomas.com/?p=209#comment-501</guid>
		<description>It&#8217;s not that I mind &#8220;smooth metal&#8221; &#8220;brushed metal&#8221; or &#8220;plastic&#8221; or &#8220;unified&#8221; look. They&#8217;re all fine. But not all of them at once. I&#8217;m one of the few people that wasn&#8217;t terribly upset with the look of Mail in Tiger (once I got rid of those stupid blue button backgrounds) but we&#8217;re reaching a breaking point in how many interfaces we can simultaneously expect to see. If &#8220;smooth metal&#8221; or &#8220;unified&#8221; or whatever this qualifies as is what Apple wants to standardize on now, that&#8217;s great, as long as they standardize on something. But between all of these and that horrendo interface for GarageBand there is clearly a UI designer(s?) within Apple that has a serious speed habit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the &lt;a href="http://iacs5.ucsd.edu/~alwarren/fixitunesnow.html" rel="nofollow" &gt;radius on those rounded corners?&lt;/a&gt; No. fucking. excuse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not that I mind &#8220;smooth metal&#8221; &#8220;brushed metal&#8221; or &#8220;plastic&#8221; or &#8220;unified&#8221; look. They&#8217;re all fine. But not all of them at once. I&#8217;m one of the few people that wasn&#8217;t terribly upset with the look of Mail in Tiger (once I got rid of those stupid blue button backgrounds) but we&#8217;re reaching a breaking point in how many interfaces we can simultaneously expect to see. If &#8220;smooth metal&#8221; or &#8220;unified&#8221; or whatever this qualifies as is what Apple wants to standardize on now, that&#8217;s great, as long as they standardize on something. But between all of these and that horrendo interface for GarageBand there is clearly a UI designer(s?) within Apple that has a serious speed habit.</p>
<p>But the <a href="http://iacs5.ucsd.edu/~alwarren/fixitunesnow.html" rel="nofollow"  onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/iacs5.ucsd.edu');">radius on those rounded corners?</a> No. fucking. excuse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan LaCour</title>
		<link>http://www.iammattthomas.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fiammattthomas.com%2Fjournal%2Fpick-one&amp;seed_title=Pick%26%23160%3BOne./comment-page-1#comment-500</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan LaCour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2005 22:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iammattthomas.com/?p=209#comment-500</guid>
		<description>Would you still be upset if Apple released Leopard with only two window styles: the newly introduced Unified (ala Tiger Mail.app) and Smooth Metal (ala iTunes 5)?  I wouldn&#8217;t.  I like both new window styles, apart from the sharp corners in the Smooth Metal look&#8230;  My problem is one of consistency, not of style (with the exception of brushed metal).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I predict that the next major version of Safari, the entire next iLife Suite, and the next QuickTime will all use Smooth Metal.  I also predict that the entire next release of iWork will use the Unified window style.  Thats a bright future!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you still be upset if Apple released Leopard with only two window styles: the newly introduced Unified (ala Tiger Mail.app) and Smooth Metal (ala iTunes 5)?  I wouldn&#8217;t.  I like both new window styles, apart from the sharp corners in the Smooth Metal look&#8230;  My problem is one of consistency, not of style (with the exception of brushed metal).</p>
<p>I predict that the next major version of Safari, the entire next iLife Suite, and the next QuickTime will all use Smooth Metal.  I also predict that the entire next release of iWork will use the Unified window style.  Thats a bright future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ichigo</title>
		<link>http://www.iammattthomas.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fiammattthomas.com%2Fjournal%2Fpick-one&amp;seed_title=Pick%26%23160%3BOne./comment-page-1#comment-499</link>
		<dc:creator>ichigo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2005 01:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iammattthomas.com/?p=209#comment-499</guid>
		<description>yeah i am hoping for more consistency in leopard&#8230;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah i am hoping for more consistency in leopard&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
